Tactics and Substance in the 2004 Elections | GoogleNews: Howard Dean |
First they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win. - Gandhi Syndicate VJ [XML] or track us via blo.gs VJ Archives
June 2005 ..
May 2005 ..
April 2005 ..
March 2005 ..
February 2005 ..
January 2005 ..
December 2004 ..
November 2004 ..
October 2004 ..
September 2004 ..
August 2004 ..
July 2004 ..
June 2004 ..
May 2004 ..
April 2004 ..
March 2004 ..
February 2004 ..
January 2004 ..
December 2003 ..
November 2003 ..
October 2003 ..
September 2003 ..
August 2003 ..
July 2003 ..
June 2003 ..
Howard Dean & DFA
Democracy For America
Sign up at Democracy For America Dean for America Blog for America The real "Dean Scream" Grassroots For America Winning Back America Dean Issues Forum Meetup for Dean Dean Nation Dean Defense Republicans for Dean Women For Dean Idaho For Dean Blog for Arizona Alabama For Dean Blog for Iowa Democracy for Virginia Seniors for America So Far, VJ $ Have Gone To:
Howard Dean
Richard Morrison Kalyn Free Jim Stork Kim Hynes Brad Carson Leonard Boswell John Kerry Al Weed Ginny Schrader Ken Longmyer Bobby Scott Tom Daschle Good Reads
ACT Blog for Victory
Act Blue Alas, A blog Atrios Back to the Kitchen Backup Brain Barack Obama Billmon Blogging of the President BookNotes Brad Delong Calpundit/Political Animal Capitol Grilling Change for America Daily Howler Daily Kos DCCC: The Stakeholder Demosthenes DNC: Kicking Ass Dohiyi Mir Fight for the Future/SEIU DSCC: From the Roots Electrolite Esoterically First Primary Blog Follow Me Here Ghost in the Machine Hullabaloo Hunter at dKos Interesting Times John McCrory Just a Bump in the Beltway La Di Da LiberalOasis Liberal Street Fighter Long Story Short Pier Mark A. R. Kleiman Not Geniuses NYCO at dKos NYCO's Blog/100 Days of Rwanda Of, By, and For Orcinus Our Congress rc3 Oliver Willis Pandagon Politics and War Preemptive Karma Rebecca's Pocket Red State Rebels Respectful of Otters Skeptical Notion (Morat) Talking Points Memo Tapped This Modern World Tristero Tucker Eskew Washington Note Good Government
Media Watchers
CJR's CampaignDesk
Fact-esque FactCheck.org Media For Democracy Reading A1 What a Pickler Wilgoren Watch Not Quite Big Media
Big Media
PoliticalWire
The Note (ABC) First Read (NBC) The Grind (CNN) Washington Whispers (CBS) MSNBC Campaign Embeds: Clark Dean Edwards Kerry Kucinich Lieberman Sharpton Former Candidates
Wesley Clark / blog
John Edwards / blog/ One America Committee Dick Gephardt John Kerry / blog Bob Graham / blog Dennis Kucinich / blog Joe Lieberman / blog Carol Moseley Braun Al Sharpton Value Judgment is a daily weblog written by two independent voters on the eastern seaboard of the United States. VJ will focus on the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, including strategy, tactics, and substance. The authors supported Howard Dean in the Democratic primary. Accordingly, his activities will be a prominent topic on this site. Mail us: V at valuejudgment.org or J at valuejudgment.org Link to VJ: Powered by Movable Type 3.17 |
December 11, 2003The Other Eight
I'll have a lot more to say on this point soon, but for now I'll say, I agree 100% with Atrios:
No Dean/X or X/Dean Where X=one of the other 8 candidates. The failure to "raise their hands" when Koppel asked them to do so if they thought Dean was capable of winning the election has pretty much ruled that one out. They'll play that video over and over...Is it just me, or did you also see the Careful Eight looking at each other on that question to check first if anyone else was going to raise his/her hand? Leaders, all. [cough] Posted by V at December 11, 2003 09:42 PM
Comments
The Careful Eight did indeed drop the ball. One of them could have grabbed the mic and said what a stupid and insulting question it was. I do wish that Clark or Edwards had said what others have suggested, along the lines of: "A brain-damaged ferret on speed could beat George Bush. He's failed at everything he's tried to do while in office and has made the country less prosperous, less secure, and less united as a result. He's a failed President and the American people will remove him from office as soon as possible." I'm disappointed that the Dems are too cautious and hidebound to take it straight to him, but my loathing is still deeper for the media who think this kind of gotcha crap serves the public good in any way. Koppel was a disgrace to his profession for asking the question. It was idiotic and insulting to all of the candidates and to the audience. Posted by: J at December 12, 2003 08:04 AMI would've gone with "That's like asking if he can beat Dick Cheney in a foot race." Posted by: Madden 11 at December 12, 2003 09:57 AMJ, actually it was the best question of all the debates! It probably ruled them all out as VP should Dean win the nomination, and then none of them would back it up by taking it to Dean. "Leaders, all (couhg)" is right. What other question has shown so much? It was a crappy debate, but Koppel was trying to break up the candidates' scripts. It just didn't work... backfired. Posted by: Todd at December 12, 2003 11:40 AM |
Recommended Reading:
The Politics of Truth... A Diplomat's Memoir Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right The Great Unraveling The Great Big Book of Tomorrow The Clinton Wars Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture Living History The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton John Adams Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace |