Tactics and Substance in the 2004 Elections | GoogleNews: Howard Dean |
First they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win. - Gandhi Syndicate VJ [XML] or track us via blo.gs VJ Archives
June 2005 ..
May 2005 ..
April 2005 ..
March 2005 ..
February 2005 ..
January 2005 ..
December 2004 ..
November 2004 ..
October 2004 ..
September 2004 ..
August 2004 ..
July 2004 ..
June 2004 ..
May 2004 ..
April 2004 ..
March 2004 ..
February 2004 ..
January 2004 ..
December 2003 ..
November 2003 ..
October 2003 ..
September 2003 ..
August 2003 ..
July 2003 ..
June 2003 ..
Howard Dean & DFA
Democracy For America
Sign up at Democracy For America Dean for America Blog for America The real "Dean Scream" Grassroots For America Winning Back America Dean Issues Forum Meetup for Dean Dean Nation Dean Defense Republicans for Dean Women For Dean Idaho For Dean Blog for Arizona Alabama For Dean Blog for Iowa Democracy for Virginia Seniors for America So Far, VJ $ Have Gone To:
Howard Dean
Richard Morrison Kalyn Free Jim Stork Kim Hynes Brad Carson Leonard Boswell John Kerry Al Weed Ginny Schrader Ken Longmyer Bobby Scott Tom Daschle Good Reads
ACT Blog for Victory
Act Blue Alas, A blog Atrios Back to the Kitchen Backup Brain Barack Obama Billmon Blogging of the President BookNotes Brad Delong Calpundit/Political Animal Capitol Grilling Change for America Daily Howler Daily Kos DCCC: The Stakeholder Demosthenes DNC: Kicking Ass Dohiyi Mir Fight for the Future/SEIU DSCC: From the Roots Electrolite Esoterically First Primary Blog Follow Me Here Ghost in the Machine Hullabaloo Hunter at dKos Interesting Times John McCrory Just a Bump in the Beltway La Di Da LiberalOasis Liberal Street Fighter Long Story Short Pier Mark A. R. Kleiman Not Geniuses NYCO at dKos NYCO's Blog/100 Days of Rwanda Of, By, and For Orcinus Our Congress rc3 Oliver Willis Pandagon Politics and War Preemptive Karma Rebecca's Pocket Red State Rebels Respectful of Otters Skeptical Notion (Morat) Talking Points Memo Tapped This Modern World Tristero Tucker Eskew Washington Note Good Government
Media Watchers
CJR's CampaignDesk
Fact-esque FactCheck.org Media For Democracy Reading A1 What a Pickler Wilgoren Watch Not Quite Big Media
Big Media
PoliticalWire
The Note (ABC) First Read (NBC) The Grind (CNN) Washington Whispers (CBS) MSNBC Campaign Embeds: Clark Dean Edwards Kerry Kucinich Lieberman Sharpton Former Candidates
Wesley Clark / blog
John Edwards / blog/ One America Committee Dick Gephardt John Kerry / blog Bob Graham / blog Dennis Kucinich / blog Joe Lieberman / blog Carol Moseley Braun Al Sharpton Value Judgment is a daily weblog written by two independent voters on the eastern seaboard of the United States. VJ will focus on the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, including strategy, tactics, and substance. The authors supported Howard Dean in the Democratic primary. Accordingly, his activities will be a prominent topic on this site. Mail us: V at valuejudgment.org or J at valuejudgment.org Link to VJ: Powered by Movable Type 3.17 |
December 13, 2003Edwards' Latest Speech
John Edwards gave a speech the other day attacking Dean's campaign. Oh, he called it "In Defense of Optimism" but it was an attack on what the Dean campaign is trying to accomplish. The unfortunate part for me is that I really want to like John Edwards. I really like his "war on work/wealth over work" rhetoric, and I have the vague sense that he's not a complete phony. But this speech was half really good stuff, and half vague innuendo and not-quite-truthful attack on what he perceives to be his major opponent's message. A few examples of where he goes off the rails a bit:
We hear a lot about which candidate can engage the most partisans in December of 2003, and that’s important. But what’s more important is which candidate will help the most Americans, because that’s what matters in November 2004. It's great to engage people through the Internet, but we need to make sure we reach every American: not just those who can afford a computer, but those who can’t and those who have no interest in signing up in any campaign. People like that matter, too.The implication that some campaigns are only reaching people through the Internet is bogus. The campaign which is making the most use of the Internet also has the most volunteers on the ground - leafletting, phonebanking, and wearing out shoe leather. So, it's a false premise. The second paragraph annoyed me very much. Here's the thing: I believe that it is every citizen's duty and obligation to be "politically engaged." For Edwards to imply that it's just fine not to be is exactly the wrong message to be sending. The Democratic party should be reaching out to people and imploring them to become engaged in the process and to be active citizens in a participatory democracy, not giving people a pass and patting them on the head and saying "don't you worry, I'll fix everything." Governor Dean's stump speech closer (paraphrased): The biggest lie that people like me tell you during an election is 'if you vote for me, I'll solve all your problems.' The truth is you have the power...This is important and illustrates a central component of Dean's appeal; not to be trite, but I don't think John Edwards really understands civic participation - he just doesn't get it. Later, Edwards tries out another line of attack by claiming that "some" want to avoid a values debate: Some in my party want to duck the values debate. They want to say to America: we’re not interested in your values; we want to change the subject to anything else. That’s wrong. You can’t tell voters what to believe or what to vote on.That's, of course, a mischaracterization of what Dean is trying to accomplish. He goes on: We need to take on these issues. This president says he wants to have a values debate, and that’s exactly what I will give him. On almost every issue, George Bush's values are not America's values. This administration values wealth over work...special interests over our interests, secret meetings over open debate, the privileged few over the rest of us.Which Democrat wants to leave wealth/work, special interests, and transparency alone? This is one of the most intellectually dishonest parts of this speech. Originally, of course, Edwards is referring to Dean saying that we need to talk about what unites us and what challenges we can solve together (health care, the economy, and so on...) instead of "guns, god, gays", but then he somehow tries to imply that, no, the values issues that other Democrats are avoiding are special interests? Come on John Edwards, which Democrat doesn't want to fight the special interests? You're making stuff up here. I work with a lot of honorable smart lawyers, but this is slippery lawyer rhetoric. Cut it out. Later: When I am president, [...] we’ll have a president who stands up for your values, not runs from them.Which values are those, John Edwards? And which of your Democrat colleagues would not also stand up for the values that you say you'll stand up for? Posted by J at December 13, 2003 06:51 PM
Comments
|
Recommended Reading:
The Politics of Truth... A Diplomat's Memoir Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right The Great Unraveling The Great Big Book of Tomorrow The Clinton Wars Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture Living History The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton John Adams Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace |