Tactics and Substance in the 2004 Elections | GoogleNews: Howard Dean |
First they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win. - Gandhi Syndicate VJ [XML] or track us via blo.gs VJ Archives
June 2005 ..
May 2005 ..
April 2005 ..
March 2005 ..
February 2005 ..
January 2005 ..
December 2004 ..
November 2004 ..
October 2004 ..
September 2004 ..
August 2004 ..
July 2004 ..
June 2004 ..
May 2004 ..
April 2004 ..
March 2004 ..
February 2004 ..
January 2004 ..
December 2003 ..
November 2003 ..
October 2003 ..
September 2003 ..
August 2003 ..
July 2003 ..
June 2003 ..
Howard Dean & DFA
Democracy For America
Sign up at Democracy For America Dean for America Blog for America The real "Dean Scream" Grassroots For America Winning Back America Dean Issues Forum Meetup for Dean Dean Nation Dean Defense Republicans for Dean Women For Dean Idaho For Dean Blog for Arizona Alabama For Dean Blog for Iowa Democracy for Virginia Seniors for America So Far, VJ $ Have Gone To:
Howard Dean
Richard Morrison Kalyn Free Jim Stork Kim Hynes Brad Carson Leonard Boswell John Kerry Al Weed Ginny Schrader Ken Longmyer Bobby Scott Tom Daschle Good Reads
ACT Blog for Victory
Act Blue Alas, A blog Atrios Back to the Kitchen Backup Brain Barack Obama Billmon Blogging of the President BookNotes Brad Delong Calpundit/Political Animal Capitol Grilling Change for America Daily Howler Daily Kos DCCC: The Stakeholder Demosthenes DNC: Kicking Ass Dohiyi Mir Fight for the Future/SEIU DSCC: From the Roots Electrolite Esoterically First Primary Blog Follow Me Here Ghost in the Machine Hullabaloo Hunter at dKos Interesting Times John McCrory Just a Bump in the Beltway La Di Da LiberalOasis Liberal Street Fighter Long Story Short Pier Mark A. R. Kleiman Not Geniuses NYCO at dKos NYCO's Blog/100 Days of Rwanda Of, By, and For Orcinus Our Congress rc3 Oliver Willis Pandagon Politics and War Preemptive Karma Rebecca's Pocket Red State Rebels Respectful of Otters Skeptical Notion (Morat) Talking Points Memo Tapped This Modern World Tristero Tucker Eskew Washington Note Good Government
Media Watchers
CJR's CampaignDesk
Fact-esque FactCheck.org Media For Democracy Reading A1 What a Pickler Wilgoren Watch Not Quite Big Media
Big Media
PoliticalWire
The Note (ABC) First Read (NBC) The Grind (CNN) Washington Whispers (CBS) MSNBC Campaign Embeds: Clark Dean Edwards Kerry Kucinich Lieberman Sharpton Former Candidates
Wesley Clark / blog
John Edwards / blog/ One America Committee Dick Gephardt John Kerry / blog Bob Graham / blog Dennis Kucinich / blog Joe Lieberman / blog Carol Moseley Braun Al Sharpton Value Judgment is a daily weblog written by two independent voters on the eastern seaboard of the United States. VJ will focus on the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, including strategy, tactics, and substance. The authors supported Howard Dean in the Democratic primary. Accordingly, his activities will be a prominent topic on this site. Mail us: V at valuejudgment.org or J at valuejudgment.org Link to VJ: Powered by Movable Type 3.17 |
January 13, 2004Carter and Dean
A press release today from DFA:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEWhat the heck is that all about? I think getting people to ask that question is exactly what that's all about, actually. (Instead of reporting on whether or not Judy Dean wears makeup and heels, which the NYT decided was frontpage-worthy. *puke*). Anyway, there's a big long discussion at Kos (of course) about possible implications. Posted by J at January 13, 2004 08:37 PM
Comments
Question I haven't seen addressed anywhere else: If Carter does break with tradition and endorse Dean, what kind of effect would this have on future Republican races? Especially if it provokes a counter-endorsement from Clinton for Clark. (Big ifs, I know.) I realize it isn't going to matter to the current election, but next time? Is this a precedent it would be very unwise to set? Posted by: fish at January 14, 2004 01:02 AMI was wondering if and when either of you would comment on the NY Times piece on Dr. Steinberg. A piece wholly unworthy of the Times, to be sure, but it raised a relevant point: if Dean is to be the nominee, we're going to have to meet the family at some point. It's in the queue for me -- I've been travelling cross-country this week. I have been commenting a bit over at Wilgoren Watch, though. There's a long interview with both the Drs. Dean in People magazine this week if you want to meet the family in a less ridiculous way than what Wilgoren and Dowd seem to manage for the Times. Posted by: J at January 15, 2004 04:08 PMFish -- It looks more likely that Carter will not formally endorse (more emphatic statements have been released), which begs the question of what's going on in Georgia this weekend. But, even if he does, I have no idea what effect it would have on Republicans and I'm not even convinced that it's such a good or important 'tradition' to uphold. I can see some arguments against immediate predecessors, but I can't come up with a compelling reason why Ford and Bush I and Carter 'shouldn't' endorse. *Shrug* This is probably more party-related nonsense that as an independent raised by political apathetes (sic, no insult, just fact) I just don't grok. Posted by: J at January 16, 2004 10:13 AM |
Recommended Reading:
The Politics of Truth... A Diplomat's Memoir Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right The Great Unraveling The Great Big Book of Tomorrow The Clinton Wars Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture Living History The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton John Adams Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace |