Tactics and Substance in U.S. Elections | GoogleNews: congressional.election |
First they ignore you then they laugh at you then they fight you then you win. - Gandhi Syndicate VJ [XML] or track us via blo.gs VJ Archives
August 2006 ..
June 2006 ..
September 2005 ..
August 2005 ..
July 2005 ..
June 2005 ..
May 2005 ..
April 2005 ..
March 2005 ..
February 2005 ..
January 2005 ..
December 2004 ..
November 2004 ..
October 2004 ..
September 2004 ..
August 2004 ..
July 2004 ..
June 2004 ..
May 2004 ..
April 2004 ..
March 2004 ..
February 2004 ..
January 2004 ..
December 2003 ..
November 2003 ..
October 2003 ..
September 2003 ..
August 2003 ..
July 2003 ..
June 2003 ..
Howard Dean & DFA
Democracy For America
Sign up at Democracy For America Dean for America Blog for America The real "Dean Scream" Grassroots For America Winning Back America Dean Issues Forum Meetup for Dean Dean Nation Dean Defense Republicans for Dean Women For Dean Idaho For Dean Blog for Arizona Alabama For Dean Blog for Iowa Democracy for Virginia Seniors for America So Far, VJ $ Have Gone To:
Howard Dean
Richard Morrison Kalyn Free Jim Stork Kim Hynes Brad Carson Leonard Boswell John Kerry Al Weed Ginny Schrader Ken Longmyer Bobby Scott Tom Daschle Good Reads
ACT Blog for Victory
Act Blue Alas, A blog Atrios Back to the Kitchen Backup Brain Barack Obama Billmon Blogging of the President BookNotes Brad Delong Calpundit/Political Animal Capitol Grilling Change for America Daily Howler Daily Kos DCCC: The Stakeholder Demosthenes DNC: Kicking Ass Dohiyi Mir Fight for the Future/SEIU DSCC: From the Roots Electrolite Esoterically First Primary Blog Follow Me Here Ghost in the Machine Hullabaloo Hunter at dKos Interesting Times John McCrory Just a Bump in the Beltway La Di Da LiberalOasis Liberal Street Fighter Long Story Short Pier Mark A. R. Kleiman Not Geniuses NYCO at dKos NYCO's Blog/100 Days of Rwanda Of, By, and For Orcinus Our Congress rc3 Oliver Willis Pandagon Politics and War Preemptive Karma Rebecca's Pocket Red State Rebels Respectful of Otters Skeptical Notion (Morat) Talking Points Memo Tapped This Modern World Tristero Tucker Eskew Washington Note Good Government
Media Watchers
CJR's CampaignDesk
Fact-esque FactCheck.org Media For Democracy Reading A1 What a Pickler Wilgoren Watch Not Quite Big Media
Big Media
PoliticalWire
The Note (ABC) First Read (NBC) The Grind (CNN) Washington Whispers (CBS) MSNBC Campaign Embeds: Clark Dean Edwards Kerry Kucinich Lieberman Sharpton Former Candidates
Wesley Clark / blog
John Edwards / blog/ One America Committee Dick Gephardt John Kerry / blog Bob Graham / blog Dennis Kucinich / blog Joe Lieberman / blog Carol Moseley Braun Al Sharpton Value Judgment is a daily weblog written by two independent voters on the eastern seaboard of the United States. VJ will focus on the 2004 U.S. Presidential campaigns, including strategy, tactics, and substance. The authors supported Howard Dean in the Democratic primary. Accordingly, his activities will be a prominent topic on this site. Mail us: V at valuejudgment.org or J at valuejudgment.org Link to VJ: ![]() Powered by Movable Type 3.33 |
February 13, 2004![]() Not Bad, Not Bad
An encouraging sign that the Kerryites mean it when they say they'll fight back against the Dubya smear machine.
In a new video message being sent to millions of people, President Bush's re-election campaign casts Sen. John Kerry as a tool of the special interests he regularly denounces.I give it an A-. Succint, incorporates campaign soundbite ("bring it on"), turns the attack back against Dubya, raises issues (environment, economy) and includes an easily-verifiable fact for lazy reporters. Posted by J at February 13, 2004 1:56 PM
Comments
I think "bring it on" sucks, since it shows that Kerry has no leadership capability... his strategy is to play on the field laid out by the Bushies... reacting to their agenda. Leadership would mean "take it to them" by redefining the terms of the debate, setting the agenda, laying out his own playing field. Well, I agree that if they simply accept the Republican terms of the debate they're dead. Dead. But that's true for all of the Dems. Dean is willing to reframe issues, as is Edwards to an extent. John "marriage is about babies" Kerry... not so much that I've seen. The reason I like "bring it on" is because of the implicit mockery of and disdain for Dubya that it conveys. Posted by: J at February 13, 2004 2:52 PMI'm with Todd. One thing I seriously disliked about Clark was that he was always saying "I'm the only one who can go toe-to-toe with George Bush on national security." Like that's some great acheivement. Right now, I'm seriously worried about two things: 1) A bimbo eruption in the general. I'm no Drudge fan, but Kerry's denial on Imus didn't read terribly strong to me. If it was me, I would've gone with something more like "This rumor is a complete and utter fabrication. It contains not a single shred of truth nor evidence. I have never, NEVER cheated on my wife." 2) That Kerry will fall apart without Dean taking all the hits for him, and framing the debate. We'll see the Kerry that got trounced by Dean in the beginning of this campaign. Boring, rudderless, uninspiring. It comes down to this...either anybody could beat Bush in November, or nobody could. It's not entirely within either candidate's control. But if the former is true, then of all the serious candidates since the get-go, it seems to me that Kerry is most likely to fumble it. Posted by: Madden 11 at February 13, 2004 5:29 PMWell, IMO anybody could beat Bush if he has a meltdown, which may be a possibility. WIth $200 million and the presidency as a platform, I tend to doubt that though. Bush has had a bad month and Kerry a good one, and they are still pretty even in the polls. A Bush meltdown is Kerry's only chance IMO. Absent this, I think Dean has the best chance to beat Bush since he is a wild card type... and shows the most natural leadership ability. Posted by: Todd at February 13, 2004 8:05 PM>>Kerry's spokeswoman, Stephanie Cutter, responded: "If the Bush White House wants to raise special interests as an issue, then bring it on." ```````````````````````````````````````````````` you call that a defense?? difference between kerry and bush on this issue is that bush didn't dance around fraudulently posture himself as a populist vowing to fight special interests like kerry's done. get it? it's kerry who looks the hypocrite. kerry still hasn't defend charges that he gave favors for contributions. saying nominations for cash was merely a "coincidence" doesn't cut it. if you actually buy that line, i've got a bridge in brooklyn to sell ya. But that's the point niner. It's not a defense. Dubya attacking anyone about special interests is hypocritical beyond belief. And to my mind it's a good thing that instead of accepting the criticism and attempting to rebut it (which is just another way of accepting the Republican terms of debate, a fatal flaw among Democrats lately), the Kerry campaign is going to fight back. It doesn't matter what I buy or don't buy about Kerry. As much as I don't like Kerry, Dubya is worse for this country than Kerry, often much worse, in just about every conceivable dimension. Posted by: J at February 15, 2004 9:47 AMyou can't beat corruption with corruption-lite. while republicans can get away with murder, democrats are held to a higher standard. of course that's not fair but that is the reality. Posted by: niner at February 20, 2004 2:57 AM |
Recommended Reading:
![]() The Politics of Truth... A Diplomat's Memoir ![]() Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush ![]() Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror ![]() Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right ![]() The Great Unraveling ![]() The Great Big Book of Tomorrow ![]() The Clinton Wars ![]() Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative Waging Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo, and the Future of Combat Subject to Debate: Sense and Dissents on Women, Politics, and Culture Living History The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton John Adams Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace ![]() |